Flagship Services Group: The Conditional Payments Resolution Experts

Posted by Rafael Gonzalez on Sep 20, 2017 8:30:00 AM

As we have continued to inform on this blog, at multiple conference presentations throughout the country, and at training sessions for current and potential clients over the last several years, conditional payments resolution isn't just about traditional Medicare any more. Today, conditional payments resolution is about identifying, investigating, analyzing, disputing, appealing, resolving, and closing such claims not just with Medicare Parts A (hospital) and B (physician) coverage, but also with Medicare Parts C (Medicare Advantage Plans) and D (Prescription Drug Plans), as well as Medicaid.

Read More

Topics: Conditional Payments

Resolution of Conditional Payments Continue to Create Havoc on No-Fault Claims

Posted by Rafael Gonzalez on Aug 20, 2017 8:00:00 AM

Medicare conditional payments are serious business. They continue to challenge claims professionals throughout the country. And if not dealt with timely and appropriately, can create havoc on parties’ attempt to settle a claim, or future reimbursement responsibility.

Read More

Topics: Conditional Payments, medicare

Leaving Reimbursement of Medicare Conditional Payments to Plaintiff May End Up Costing You

Posted by Rafael Gonzalez on Aug 16, 2017 1:00:00 PM

We all mean well. Everyone handling claims tries to do the right thing. But sometimes, things just don’t go as planned and end up taking significantly longer than expected and costing way more than agreed.

Read More

Topics: Conditional Payments

CPLs and CPNs are Not Bills

Posted by Gina Cox on May 19, 2017 9:00:00 AM

cpl.png

Read More

Topics: Conditional Payments

Florida Federal Court Orders Beneficiary to Reimburse Higher Conditional Payments, Despite Medicare’s Verbal Representation of Lower Amount Due

Posted by Rafael Gonzalez on Apr 6, 2017 8:00:00 AM

On March 23, 2017, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida published its opinion on Shapiro v. Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services, concluding that, even though Plaintiff and her attorney may have relied on Medicare’s verbal representation of $17,306.03 in conditional payments to settle the case, absent a waiver from CMS or its contractors in writing, the MSP Act requires Plaintiff to reimburse Medicare, and permits the Secretary of HHS to recover, the full $23,552.96 it paid in conditional payments from date of accident thru date of settlement. Since Plaintiff did not request a waiver for reimbursing all or part of the debt based on financial hardship, and failed to prove recovery is against equity and good conscience, court concludes plaintiff did not suffer a material detriment as she would still received 96% of settlement proceeds she agreed to.

Read More

Topics: Compliance, Medicare Law, Conditional Payments